Sunday। 15 November। 2026
আগামীর সময়
Sunday। 15 November। 2026
Agamir Somoy
  • Latest
  • Bangladesh
  • Business
  • Chattogram
  • District
  • World
  • Environment
  • Entertainment
  • Sports
  • Feature
  • OP-ED
  • Misc
  • Success Story
  • Religion
BN
  • Latest
  • Bangladesh
  • Business
  • Chattogram
  • District
  • World
  • Environment
  • Entertainment
  • Sports
  • Feature
  • OP-ED
  • Misc
  • BN
লোড হচ্ছে…

Chief Editor & Publisher: Abdus Sattar Miazi

Editor: Mustafa Mamun

Agamir Somoy English Logo
About UsContactTerms of ServicePrivacy PolicyTeam

EDB Trade Centre (Level-6 &7) 93 Kazi Nazrul Islam Avenue Karwanbazar, Dhaka-1215.

Contact: +880 9666 771010

Advertise: +880 1755 651164

[email protected]

© 2026 | Dainik Agamir Somoy. All rights reserved.

আগামীর সময় Court

Supreme court

183 days of court vacation amid 4.8 million pending cases at supreme court

  • Judges go abroad during vacations despite having time to write judgments
  • 674,767 cases pending in High Court Division alone
  • Lawyers call for fresh review of court vacation schedule
Golam Rabbani
agamir somoy
Published: 15 November 2026, 13:07
শেয়ার করুন:
183 days of court vacation amid 4.8 million pending cases at supreme court

Graphics: Agamir Somoy

There are 365 days in a year. In 2026, however, the Appellate Division and High Court Division of Bangladesh’s Supreme Court will remain closed for 183 days. This means regular judicial proceedings at the country’s highest court will remain suspended for more than half the year. In contrast, the court will remain open for only 182 days.

An analysis of the Supreme Court’s 2026 calendar shows that the court will observe 104 days of weekly holidays on Fridays and Saturdays. In addition, there will be 63 days of court vacations designated by the Supreme Court itself and 16 days of government-declared holidays. This brings the total number of days without regular judicial proceedings to 183. Apart from these scheduled holidays, court proceedings are occasionally suspended following the death of senior lawyers.

With hundreds of thousands of cases pending at the country’s highest court, the practice of suspending regular judicial proceedings for nearly half the year has once again come under scrutiny. The debate has particularly intensified over the lengthy vacation period designated by the Supreme Court itself. While the need for vacations is justified on the grounds that judges require time to write pending judgments and complete other judicial work, there are growing calls to reconsider the length of the holidays to reduce the backlog of cases.

Some legal experts believe court vacations are essential for judges to write judgments, conduct research and complete accumulated judicial work. However, another group has questioned whether such lengthy vacations are justified for these purposes. They argue that although the stated objective of vacations is to allow judges to complete pending judgments and advance judicial work, it is necessary to review whether all judges actually use this time for such purposes. There are allegations that some judges travel abroad during court vacations.

It is learned that the court vacation period was 64 days in 2023. Although it was set at 63 days in 2024, the period increased to 66 days in 2025. However, it was reduced to 63 days again in 2026.

The lengthy vacations are having a significant impact on judicial proceedings. As of June 30, 2026, a total of 4,855,495 cases were pending across Bangladesh. Of these, 674,767 were pending in the High Court Division and 38,651 in the Appellate Division. The remaining cases were pending in the lower courts.

Amid this enormous backlog, an average of 63 or 64 days of annual court vacations is creating further challenges. Lawyers, people associated with the judiciary and even officials within the Supreme Court administration are questioning how far the existing vacation system is compatible with current realities.

High CourtSupreme CourtAppellate DivisionCase backlogJudicial systemVacation benchesPending casesAccess to justiceJudicial proceedingsCourt vacation
    আগামীর সময় ইপেপার
    শেয়ার করুন:

    Attorney General Barrister Md Ruhul Quddus Kazal has said lengthy court vacations are creating obstacles to the functioning of the judicial system and people’s access to justice.

    Speaking to Agamir Somoy, he said, “A lengthy vacation is creating obstacles to bringing momentum to our judicial system. In many cases, it is also creating barriers to people’s access to justice.”

    The country’s chief law officer believes that the stated justification for lengthy vacations, allowing judges to write pending judgments, is not being fulfilled in practice.

    He said, “There is also an expectation that many judges will write their pending judgments during the lengthy vacation. That expectation is not being fulfilled either. There are some who do not write even a single judgment during a month’s vacation. What will they do with the vacation, then?”

    He expressed hope that the Chief Justice would reconsider the lengthy vacation period. He said reducing holidays and involving judges more extensively in judicial work would significantly ease the public’s growing demand for the resolution of pending cases, a need that is felt at every moment.

    However, Supreme Court senior lawyer Manzill Murshid has expressed a different view.

    Speaking to Agamir Somoy, he said judges have to deliver orders and judgments in numerous cases every day. Time is required to prepare the full copies of those orders and judgments. If court proceedings continue without interruption, files from numerous cases accumulate in judges’ chambers. Therefore, reducing their vacation period would make it impossible to complete such work.

    The lawyer said vacation benches remain operational at the Supreme Court to handle urgent cases. Anyone seeking urgent legal remedies can approach these benches. He added that the number of vacation benches could also be increased.

    The debate over the length of court vacations is not new. An investigation found that former Chief Justice Surendra Kumar Sinha had taken an initiative to reduce judicial vacations during his tenure. The issue was also raised at a full court meeting of the Supreme Court. However, only two judges from both divisions supported the proposal. The initiative was not implemented.

    The tradition of lengthy vacations at higher courts began during British India, primarily in response to practical necessities at the time. Most judges then came to India from Britain and had to undertake lengthy sea voyages to travel between the two countries. The tradition of extended vacations developed in consideration of the extreme summer heat in India, the heavy workload of judges and the time required to write judgments. The system remained in place during the Pakistan period and continued in the judicial system of independent Bangladesh.

    However, circumstances have changed. Judges now live in the country. Most have official residences near the Supreme Court, while their ancestral homes are also within Bangladesh. This has brought renewed attention to the question of how far a vacation system developed on the basis of circumstances more than a century ago remains compatible with present-day judicial requirements.

    Nevertheless, the Supreme Court’s administrative activities continue during court vacations. Court offices remain open, and the Chief Justice forms vacation benches to handle urgent judicial matters. The Chamber Court of the Appellate Division and vacation benches of the High Court Division operate on a limited scale. These benches generally hear matters involving bail, writ petitions, urgent civil and criminal applications and other necessary issues. At the same time, many judges work on writing reserved judgments, conducting research and preparing judgments in pending cases.

    However, despite the existence of vacation benches, hearings in most regular writ petitions, civil appeals, company cases, tax cases, land disputes and long-pending cases effectively remain suspended. As a result, the continuity of judicial proceedings is disrupted.

    After the vacation ends, additional time is required to prepare fresh cause lists, reconstitute benches, allow lawyers to prepare and organize case documents. Consequently, hearings in many cases are delayed further.

    Thus, although the courts are not legally closed entirely, the judicial process effectively comes to a standstill for a significant portion of litigants.